WebRTC Architecture for Production Video & Audio Apps

Zoom, Meet, Discord and Slack run WebRTC at planet scale because they spent years engineering everything around it: SFUs, edge POPs, TURN, congestion control, monitoring, recording and compliance.

This page is the reference architecture we use to ship the same kind of system in 8–16 weeks for SaaS, telehealth, e-learning, fintech and SMB platforms β€” distilled from 625+ real-time products and 600M+ monthly call minutes our clients run on it.

Book a 30-min architecture call πŸš€Get a fixed quote πŸ’‘

TL;DR // WebRTC Architecture in Production

Five decisions that separate a production WebRTC system from a working demo. Each is expanded in detail below.

β€’ Production WebRTC is never pure peer-to-peer past 4 users. You always need a media server (SFU), a TURN fallback, edge POPs and active monitoring β€” not optional, just the cost of doing this in production.
β€’ SFUs (mediasoup, LiveKit, Janus, Pion) are the default for 99% of products: lowest latency, lowest server cost, scales to thousands of concurrent users on commodity hardware.
β€’ MCUs are niche β€” legacy SIP/H.323 endpoints, single-stream broadcast, server-side mixing. Expect 3–5Γ— the CPU cost per participant compared to an SFU.
β€’ End-to-end latency is a budget, not a metric. Target ≀ 300 ms: capture 10–50 ms + encode 10–30 ms + network 20–200 ms + server 5–50 ms + decode + render. Edge POPs and codec tuning own most of it.
β€’ Keep ML out of the real-time path unless it directly improves the live call (noise suppression, background blur, AGC). Transcription, moderation, sentiment and analytics belong on a side pipeline that can lag a few seconds.
β€’ HIPAA, GDPR and SOC 2 are architecture decisions, not paperwork. SRTP/DTLS, recording retention, regional data residency and access control are picked on day one β€” retro-fitting them costs 3–6Γ— more.
Nucleus communication software showing video call, phone call, and chat interface on mobile phones and laptop screen.
project example

Nucleus

A secure on-premise Slack alternative for SMBs with WebRTC and SIP video/audio calls, task tracking and SMS chat. Trusted by 5,000+ businesses, handling 600M+ call minutes a month with AI phone agents. CRM/ERP integrations automate sales, support and scheduling. SOC II, GDPR, HIPAA-compliant.

Production-Grade WebRTC, Explained

1. The Six Layers of a Production WebRTC System

A production WebRTC system is six independent subsystems wired together: clients, signaling, media servers, edge/network, recording/storage, and ML/analytics. Each layer has one job, one failure mode, and one scaling axis. Confuse the layers and you ship a demo, not a product.

Every WebRTC product we ship at Fora Soft β€” video calls for telehealth, virtual classrooms, fintech advisor calls, surveillance, broadcasts β€” reduces to the same six layers:

  • Clients (browser, iOS, Android, Electron) β€” capture, preprocess, encode (Opus / VP8 / VP9 / AV1 / H.264), decode, render. 60% of perceived quality lives here.
  • Signaling β€” WebSocket / SIP-style control plane that exchanges SDP, ICE candidates, room state. Stateless. Carries no media.
  • Media servers (SFU is default; MCU is niche) β€” mediasoup, LiveKit, Janus, Pion, Jitsi Videobridge. Forward, mix, simulcast, record, transcode.
  • Edge & network (STUN, TURN, anycast, regional POPs) β€” puts the SFU within ~50 ms of every user. TURN catches the 8–20% of users behind symmetric NAT.
  • Recording & storage β€” ingest from the SFU, transcode to MP4/HLS, encrypt at rest, retain per HIPAA/GDPR rules. Almost always required, even when users β€œnever replay calls.”
  • ML & analytics pipeline β€” noise suppression and background blur on the client; transcription, moderation, sentiment and call scoring on a side bus, never in the live RTP path.
The six layers of a production WebRTC system: Clients, Signaling, Media Servers (SFU vs MCU), Edge & Network, Recording & Storage, and ML & Analytics β€” Fora Soft reference architecture

Why this matters in production: every outage we have ever debugged in a WebRTC system traced back to confusing two of these layers β€” putting state in signaling, putting ML in the live path, recording from the client instead of the server, or skipping TURN. Get the boundaries right and the rest is engineering.

2. Core Components Explained

2.1 The Client β€” Where 60% of Quality Is Won or Lost

The client (Chrome, Safari, the iOS/Android SDK, an Electron desktop app, or a native C++ implementation on hardware) is where camera frames and microphone samples become RTP packets. The client is also where the user can blame their laptop β€” so we engineer it for minimal latency and predictable CPU on every plausible device, not just the one in your pocket.

What the WebRTC client must do, in order, every 33 ms (30 fps) or 16 ms (60 fps):

  • Capture raw frames from the camera and PCM samples from the microphone via getUserMedia and the constraints API
  • Apply local DSP β€” acoustic echo cancellation (AEC), noise suppression (NS) and automatic gain control (AGC); add ML noise removal (RNNoise, Krisp-style) when CPU allows
  • Encode with the right codec for the device: Opus for audio (always), VP8 for compatibility, VP9/AV1 for bandwidth efficiency on capable hardware, H.264 for iOS/Safari fallback
  • Send encrypted SRTP/DTLS packets to the SFU; react to bandwidth estimation (transport-cc, REMB) by switching simulcast layers within milliseconds
  • Decode incoming streams, jitter-buffer them, render to <video> or a Canvas/WebGL pipeline, and recover gracefully from packet loss with PLC, FEC and NACK

Skip a step or pick the wrong codec for one device class and you ship a product that works perfectly on the founder’s MacBook and burns CPU on a 2-year-old Android. We catch this in week one of the engagement, not after launch.

WebRTC client media pipeline running every 33 ms (30 fps): camera capture, AEC + NS + AGC pre-processing with optional client-side ML, encoding (Opus, VP8, VP9, AV1, H.264), SRTP/DTLS send, decode with PLC/FEC/NACK, render to <video> or Canvas β€” with millisecond ranges per stage
Pro tip β€” client-side ML buys you milliseconds, not just features

Background blur, RNNoise/Krisp noise suppression, virtual background and face tracking all run far better on-device than server-side. Each round-trip you avoid saves 20–80 ms and offloads server CPU β€” often the difference between a $400/month and a $4,000/month media-server bill at 1,000 concurrent users.

2.2 Signaling β€” The Stateless Control Plane

Signaling is the WebRTC layer everyone underestimates. It exists to answer one question β€” how do these two endpoints meet and agree on what to send each other? Signaling never carries audio or video. It carries setup and room state β€” nothing else.

A production signaling server has four jobs:

  • Exchange SDP offers and answers between participants and the SFU
  • Trickle ICE candidates so connections start before all candidates are gathered
  • Manage rooms, presence, mute state, hand-raise, screen-share intent and reconnect tokens
  • Hand out STUN/TURN credentials with short TTLs so abandoned tokens cannot be reused

Typical implementations: WebSocket on Node.js / Go / Elixir for greenfield, SIP/SIMPLE when you must integrate with PBX or telephony, MQTT or NATS when you also publish presence and chat over the same bus.

WebRTC signaling and ICE handshake sequence between Client A, the stateless WebSocket signaling server and the SFU (mediasoup / LiveKit / Janus): SDP offer and answer, trickle ICE, STUN binding, DTLS handshake, then SRTP media flowing direct between Client and SFU
Pro tip β€” keep signaling stateless and disposable

Push room state into Redis or a Postgres LISTEN/NOTIFY channel β€” never the signaling node’s memory. Then you can blue-green deploy mid-call, autoscale on connection count, and survive an AZ outage with a 5–10-second reconnect rather than a dropped session.

2.3 Media Servers β€” SFU vs MCU vs Mesh

SFU β€” Selective Forwarding Unit (default for 99% of products)

Forwards encrypted RTP packets without decoding β€’ Tiny CPU footprint per stream β€’ Lowest possible end-to-end latency β€’ Supports simulcast and SVC β€’ Open-source: mediasoup, LiveKit, Janus, Jitsi Videobridge, Pion, ion-sfu β€’ A single Hetzner AX52 (16-core, ~€80/mo) handles 1,000–1,500 concurrent forwarded streams

Reach for an SFU when:

  • Multi-party video / audio (3 to 1,000+ in a room)
  • Latency must stay sub-300 ms (telehealth, classrooms, fintech advisory, gaming voice)
  • You need server-side recording, transcription, broadcast egress to RTMP/HLS, or AI hooks
  • Modern browsers / iOS+Android SDKs are your only clients (no SIP hardware)

Skip an SFU only when:

  • Always 1-on-1 calls and you do not need recording β€” a P2P mesh with TURN fallback is cheaper
  • Calls must inter-op with legacy SIP/H.323 PBX hardware β€” you need an MCU or a gateway
  • End users have hard 200 kbps caps and devices that can only decode one stream β€” server-side mixing wins
  • Regulator forces a single recorded composite stream (some courtrooms, some financial trading floors)
MCU β€” Multipoint Control Unit (specialist tool, expensive at scale)

Decodes every incoming stream, mixes them server-side, encodes one composite back to each participant β€’ 3–5Γ— the CPU per call vs an SFU β€’ Adds 30–80 ms of mixing latency β€’ Open-source: Jitsi Videobridge in mixing mode, Janus with the AudioBridge plugin, FreeSWITCH β€’ Commercial: Pexip, Vidyo, Cisco β€’ Costs jump to ~€0.50/concurrent-participant/hour at scale

Reach for an MCU when:

  • Legacy SIP/H.323 endpoints (boardroom hardware, telephony bridges) must join the same call as browsers
  • Broadcast / single-stream egress where the server must produce a fixed layout (e.g. courtroom, trading desk, surveillance grid)
  • Compliance demands a single immutable composite recording, signed and timestamped

Avoid an MCU when:

  • Conferences over ~25 participants β€” server cost grows quadratically
    ‍
  • Sub-300 ms latency budgets (every mixing step costs you 30–80 ms)
    ‍
  • Cost-sensitive products and consumer SaaS β€” the per-minute economics rarely work
Pro tip β€” default to an SFU; only switch to MCU if a regulator or a hardware fleet forces you

MCUs simplify client logic by handing every participant a single pre-mixed stream. They pay for it with 3–5Γ— the server cost per participant and an extra 30–80 ms of latency. Across 600M+ monthly call minutes our clients run on this stack, an SFU has been the right answer 9 times out of 10.

Picking the wrong media-server pattern is the single most expensive WebRTC mistake we are hired to clean up.

2.4 Edge & Network β€” Where 70% of Latency Hides

Codec choice tweaks 5–20 ms. Geography decides the other 70–200 ms. The edge layer’s job is to keep every user within ~50 ms of an SFU and around the broken half of the internet:

  • Place SFUs in regional POPs (US-East, US-West, EU-Central, APAC, LATAM) β€” Hetzner, Equinix Metal, AWS Local Zones, Cloudflare egress regions
  • Route users to the nearest healthy POP via anycast DNS or geo-load-balancing (Cloudflare, NS1, Route 53 latency policies)
  • Dampen jitter and packet loss with congestion control (Google CC / transport-cc), simulcast layer switching, and FEC for audio
  • Run TURN (coturn or eturnal) in every region as fallback for the 8–20% of users behind symmetric NAT, corporate firewalls or carrier-grade NAT
Edge routing for production WebRTC: clients in Tokyo, Singapore, New York and London routed via anycast DNS and a geo load balancer to regional SFU clusters with TURN in US-East, EU-Central and APAC β€” keeping every user within ~50 ms of an SFU
Pro tip β€” 30 ms is the threshold humans notice

Round-trip latency above ~150 ms makes conversation feel awkward; above 250 ms it becomes β€œhalf-duplex.” The cheapest way to fix it is a closer POP, not a smarter codec. We typically launch products in 3–4 regions, then expand based on web-analytics geography.

2.5 Recording, Storage & Replay

Recording is required in almost every B2B WebRTC product we ship β€” telehealth visit notes, classroom replays, fintech compliance archives, courtroom evidence. Even when end users β€œnever replay calls,” the regulator does.
A safe recording pipeline always has these four stages:

  • Server-side capture from the SFU (never the client) β€” mediasoup recorder, LiveKit egress, Janus recording plugin, or a custom GStreamer/FFmpeg consumer
  • Encrypt at rest in S3 / Backblaze B2 / Cloudflare R2 with KMS-managed keys; pin the bucket region for data residency
  • Retention policies enforced in code (e.g. 7 days for telehealth visit recordings, 7 years for HIPAA notes, 10 years for some financial advisory)
  • Optional post-processing on a separate worker pool: Whisper transcription, redaction, summarization, MP4/HLS transcode for replay
Server-side recording pipeline with retention and compliance: SFU β†’ Recording Worker (GStreamer / FFmpeg / LiveKit egress) β†’ Encrypted Storage (S3 / R2 / B2 + KMS, region-pinned) β†’ Retention Policy (7d / 7y / 10y) β†’ Async Workers (Whisper, summary, search index), with HIPAA + HITRUST, GDPR, SOC 2, FERPA, PCI-DSS
Pro tip β€” design the recording pipeline for compliance first, UX second

Audit logs, immutable storage and retention enforcement are 10Γ— more expensive to retro-fit than to design in. Build the legal/compliance flow on day one; layer transcription, summaries and search on top later.

2.6 ML in WebRTC β€” Three Tiers, One Hard Rule

Machine learning adds intelligence to a real-time stack β€” and adds latency, GPU cost, and complexity if it lands in the wrong tier. Three tiers, picked deliberately, almost always beats one big monolithic AI service:

Where each model belongs:

  • Client-side (every frame, on-device): RNNoise / Krisp noise suppression, MediaPipe background blur and segmentation, face / hand tracking, ONNX Runtime tiny models. Adds < 10 ms per frame.
  • Server-side (live, side-bus from the SFU): streaming Whisper / Deepgram for live captions, content moderation (NSFW, profanity), keyword spotting, voice-activity detection. Always on a side pipeline that can lag 1–3 seconds.
  • Async / cloud (after the call ends): full Whisper-Large transcription, GPT-class summarization and call scoring, sentiment analysis, embedding-based search across recorded calls.

Put ML in the live RTP path only when:

  • The user can see / hear the result immediately (noise removed, blur applied, caption appears)
  • It improves the audio or video itself (denoise, super-resolution, voice clone for accessibility)
  • Safety / moderation must trigger inside the call, not at audit time (kid-safe rooms, regulated coaching)

Keep ML out of the live path when:

  • It produces analytics, dashboards or reports that can wait minutes or hours
    ‍
  • It does not change anything the participants see or hear during the call
  • It uses a heavy model (>200 ms inference) that would blow the latency budget
Where each ML model belongs in a real-time WebRTC system: client-side noise suppression and blur, server-side live captions and moderation, async cloud transcription and analytics β€” with latency budgets per tier
Pro tip β€” each ML hop you avoid in the live path is 50–300 ms back in the budget

If a feature does not need real-time feedback, push it onto a side bus (Kafka, NATS, SQS) that consumes a copy of the SFU stream. Same models, same outputs β€” just decoupled from the call quality budget.

3. The Latency Budget β€” Where Each Millisecond Goes

Every video frame travels through 7 stages between camera and far-side eyeball. β€œFix the latency” only means anything if you know which stage is bleeding milliseconds:

  1. Camera capture (typically 5–20 ms; mobile sensors are slower than laptops)
  2. Pre-processing β€” AEC, NS, AGC, optional ML denoise / blur (5–20 ms)
  3. Encoding β€” Opus / VP8 / VP9 / AV1 / H.264 (10–30 ms; AV1 software encode can spike to 50 ms)
  4. Network transport clientβ†’SFU (20–200 ms depending on POP distance, ISP, Wi-Fi vs cellular)
  5. SFU forwarding (5–15 ms) or MCU mixing (30–80 ms)
  6. Decoding plus jitter buffer on the far side (10–40 ms; jitter buffer often dominates on lossy networks)
  7. Render to <video> / Canvas (5–20 ms; vsync and compositor on mobile can add a frame)

Realistic budgets at each layer (mouth-to-ear / glass-to-glass):

  • Capture + preprocess + encode: 25–70 ms (client side)
  • Network client ↔ SFU ↔ client: 40–250 ms (driven entirely by geography and ISP)
  • Server-side processing: 5–15 ms with an SFU; 30–80 ms with an MCU
  • Decode + jitter + render: 20–60 ms (worst on cellular and on cheap Android)

Healthy end-to-end target: ≀ 300 ms for conversation, ≀ 150 ms for music collaboration or voice gaming, ≀ 50 ms for surveillance/control loops (those usually need MoQ/QUIC, not stock WebRTC).

End-to-end WebRTC latency budget from glass to glass: Capture, Pre-process, Encode, Network up, SFU forward, Network down, Decode + jitter, Render β€” with proportional millisecond ranges and healthy targets (≀ 50 ms surveillance, ≀ 150 ms music, ≀ 300 ms conversation, 500+ ms half-duplex)
Pro Tip: Measure latency continuously

Run synthetic calls every 60 seconds from each region, record real-user MOS / round-trip / jitter via getStats(), feed it into Prometheus + Grafana. Server logs alone will hide the worst sessions β€” the ones your loudest users complain about.

4. Compliance & Security β€” HIPAA, GDPR, SOC 2, PCI-DSS

Almost every B2B WebRTC product we ship handles regulated data: PHI in telehealth, FERPA in classrooms, MNPI in financial advisory, evidence chain-of-custody in legal-tech. Compliance is an architecture decision β€” SRTP, recording retention, regional data residency β€” not a checklist done after launch.

Five non-negotiable controls in every production WebRTC stack:

  • End-to-encrypted media on the wire β€” SRTP keyed by DTLS, mandatory in WebRTC, plus optional E2EE Insertable Streams when you want zero-knowledge media servers
  • TLS 1.2/1.3 on every signaling, REST and WebSocket endpoint; HSTS, OCSP stapling, certificate pinning on native clients
  • Role-based access to recordings, with short-lived signed URLs, watermarking, and download audit trail
  • Append-only audit logs (who joined, who recorded, who replayed, what was deleted) shipped to a separate account / region for tamper resistance
  • Data residency + retention enforced in code per tenant β€” EU traffic stays on EU servers, US-HIPAA tenants in US-only AWS / GCP regions, Russia/China per local law

Frameworks our clients have shipped against: HIPAA + HITRUST (Nucleus, telehealth), GDPR (every EU client), SOC 2 Type II (every B2B SaaS), FERPA (BrainCert and other LMS), PCI-DSS (some fintech voice products). When the auditor asks, we hand them an architecture diagram β€” not a promise.

Five non-negotiable WebRTC security and compliance controls (SRTP/DTLS, TLS, KMS-encrypted storage, RBAC, audit logs) plus the frameworks Fora Soft has shipped against: HIPAA + HITRUST, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, FERPA, PCI-DSS
Pro tip β€” retro-fitted compliance always costs 3–6Γ— more

Picking S3 with default keys, hard-coding region, recording on the client, mixing tenants in one bucket β€” each is a half-day decision in week one and a 6-week migration after the SOC 2 auditor finds it. Build the right way once.

5. Production Best Practices We Apply on Every WebRTC Project

These four habits separate a launchable WebRTC product from a working demo. They are non-negotiable on every Fora Soft engagement β€” we set them up in the first sprint, before any feature work begins.

Blue cloud share icon

Per-component metrics β€” CPU, RAM, NACK rate, bitrate, packet loss, MOS

Blue chart arrow grow icon

Auto-scale SFU pool by concurrent participants and CPU

Blue mobile device icon

Test on real devices β€” cheap Android, iPhone SE, weak CPU, 4G

Blue stats chart icon

Architecture diagrams checked into the repo, updated every sprint

Pro tip β€” chaos-test failure paths before users do

Drop 5% of packets, kill an SFU mid-call, sever a region, lose Wi-Fi for 8 seconds, swap from cellular to Wi-Fi mid-handshake. The first time you see those scenarios should not be a Sunday-night incident with paying users on the call.

6. Failure Modes We See in Production WebRTC Systems

These six failures account for ~80% of the WebRTC outages we are hired to clean up. Most are systemic, not bugs β€” they show up the first time real users hit the system at real scale.

‍Six failure modes that bite in production:

  • Latency spikes. Almost always one POP without a backup, an overloaded SFU at peak hour, or a noisy-neighbor VM. Fix: per-region capacity headroom + auto-scale on CPU + connection count.
  • Audio drift / lipsync. Mismatched audio/video clock rates, post-mix on the server, or a custom Canvas pipeline that ignored the audio context. Fix: never re-clock; use WebRTC’s built-in synchronization.
  • TURN over-use. 50%+ of media routed through TURN means broken ICE, missing UDP on port 3478, or a TURN server in the wrong region. Healthy systems sit at 8–20% TURN.
  • Client CPU saturation. Encoding 1080p plus running ML denoise on a 4-core Android laptop = melted CPU. Fix: simulcast layers, hardware encode, ML quality tiers per device.
  • Recording failures. Almost always wrong codec config in the SFU, a worker that crashed silently, or a storage quota hit. Fix: dedicated recording workers, end-of-call integrity checks, alert if any session lacks a recording.
  • Compliance gaps. Retention not enforced, recordings cross-region, audit logs not append-only. These break SOC 2 and HIPAA audits even if calls work perfectly.

Why these slip through staging:

  • Staging traffic is synthetic and uniform; production traffic is bursty, geographic, multilingual
  • Real-world networks have packet loss, jitter and asymmetric upload that no test rig reproduces
  • Devices range from M3 MacBook to 4-year-old budget Android β€” a 20Γ— spread in CPU and decoder capability
Pro tip β€” most WebRTC failures are architecture, not code

When something breaks, look at boundaries first: which layer, which region, which device class. We have never seen a WebRTC outage that survived 24 hours of architecture-first investigation.

Where Fora Soft Goes Deeper on WebRTC

Indicative Pricing β€” What Production WebRTC Actually Costs

We use Agent Engineering across the stack β€” typically 30–50% faster and cheaper than equivalent agencies. Final price is shaped on a 30-min scoping call. We hand back a fixed scope, fixed price, fixed timeline before any code is written.We provide a detailed estimate after a short call β€” no surprises, ever.

Ready for a realistic timeline and cost breakdown tailored to your WebRTC system needs? We offer free SRS and a code audit for existing projects.

Have an idea
orΒ needΒ advice?

Contact us, and we'll discuss your project, offer ideas and provide advice. It’s free.

Why Clients Choose Fora Soft for WebRTC Development

Blue rocket icon

We Build for Production, Not Demos

625+ real-time products shipped β€” BrainCert virtual classroom (500M+ minutes, $3M ARR), Nucleus secure SMB platform (600M+ call minutes / month), Tradecaster trader video community, V.A.L.T. police video. Production WebRTC, not slide-deck WebRTC.

Blue edit icon

Architecture First, Then Code

Every engagement starts with a free SRS β€” architecture diagram, data-flow, six layers mapped to your tech stack, scaling plan, compliance plan. You see how signaling, media, storage and ML fit together before we write a single line.

Blue chart arrow down icon

Low-Latency by Design

Latency budgets are written in week one (sub-300 ms for conversation, sub-150 ms for music or trading floors). Edge POPs, codec choice, simulcast layers and jitter buffers are tuned to hit them β€” not measured after launch.

Blue text check icon

Deep SFU Expertise β€” mediasoup, LiveKit, Janus, Pion

We design, customize and scale SFU clusters for multi-party calls, broadcast, recording, AI hooks and SIP gateways. Comfortable in JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust, C++, Swift, Kotlin β€” whatever the SFU and your stack need.

Blue security shield icon

Compliance Built In, Not Bolted On

Encryption, retention, audit logs and access control are part of the day-one design. We have shipped HIPAA + HITRUST (Nucleus), SOC 2 Type II, GDPR (every EU client), FERPA (BrainCert) and PCI-DSS β€” the auditor sees diagrams, not promises.

Blue gear icon

Systems That Survive Real-World Failure

5% packet loss, region outages, mid-call Wi-Fi-to-cellular handover, SFU crash, TURN failure β€” we chaos-test every release against these scenarios. WebRTC must fail gracefully or it does not get to production.

Your WebRTC architecture questions, answered fast

WebRTC Architecture FAQ

Real-time video and audio, latency budgets, scaling, compliance β€” short answers from the team that has shipped 625+ WebRTC products.

What is WebRTC actually used for in production?

Real-time video and audio inside SaaS, telehealth, virtual classrooms, fintech advisory, customer support, gaming voice, surveillance and broadcast. Anywhere you need sub-300 ms latency between human participants on commodity browsers and mobile devices.

Is pure peer-to-peer WebRTC enough for a real product?

Only if you stay 1-on-1 forever and need no recording. Past 4 participants the upload bandwidth and CPU on the client implode. Production systems use an SFU plus TURN fallback plus regional edge POPs β€” always.

Which media server do you typically pick β€” mediasoup, LiveKit, Janus or something else?

Defaults: LiveKit when the team wants a managed-feeling SDK and built-in egress; mediasoup when we need maximum control over signaling and topology; Janus when SIP integration is required; Pion when the rest of the stack is Go. We pick on day one based on call patterns, not vendor preference.

How do you keep WebRTC latency under 300 ms?

Place SFUs in 3–4 regional POPs so every user is within ~50 ms; tune simulcast and codec choice per device tier; keep ML out of the live RTP path; instrument MOS / RTT / jitter via getStats() and alert on the worst 1% of sessions, not the average.

Can WebRTC be HIPAA, GDPR or SOC 2 compliant?

Yes β€” we have shipped HIPAA + HITRUST (Nucleus), SOC 2 Type II, GDPR (every EU client), FERPA (BrainCert) and PCI-DSS. SRTP/DTLS, regional data residency, append-only audit logs, KMS-encrypted recordings and per-tenant retention are designed in on day one, not retro-fitted.

Do you handle recording, transcription and AI features?

Yes. Server-side recording from the SFU into S3 / R2 / B2; live captions via streaming Whisper or Deepgram; async post-processing for summaries, moderation, sentiment and embedding-based search across recorded calls.

What usually breaks WebRTC systems in production?

Six patterns cover ~80% of incidents: latency spikes from one overloaded POP, audio/lipsync drift, TURN over-use (>50%), client CPU saturation from ML, recording silently failing, compliance gaps surfaced at audit. We chaos-test every release against all six.

Describe your project and we will get in touch
Enter your message
Enter your email
Enter your name

By submitting data in this form, you agree with the PersonalΒ DataΒ Processing Policy.

Your message has been sent successfully
We will contact you soon
Message not sent. Please try again.