Wireframing is the foundation of turning raw ideas into functional apps or websites. It allows you to plan user flows and interfaces before committing to costly development.
In recent years, AI-powered wireframe generation tools have made this process faster, more affordable, and more accessible to teams of all sizes, even those without dedicated design specialists.
This article explores seven leading tools and compares how they perform in terms of pricing, generation methods, and editing flexibility.
No Wireframes, No Working Software
Wireframing goes far beyond sketching boxes and arrows. It’s about validating ideas, aligning teams, and saving significant time before developers write a single line of code.
Studies show that teams using wireframes can reduce development time by as much as 30% by identifying design flaws early in the process.
AI takes this practice a step further by automating layout creation, suggesting user flows, and even producing functional prototypes from simple text prompts.
For non-designers, this is a breakthrough, enabling the creation of professional-quality wireframes without the need to master complex design tools. Whether you’re building a SaaS dashboard or a mobile-first app, AI wireframing tools help visualize products quickly and accurately.
Still, not all tools fit every project, so let’s see how Relume, Banani, Mockflow, Visily, UX Pilot, Framer, and UIzard compare.
Diving Into the Tools
🔄Relume: Speedy Sitemaps for Web Builders
Relume is designed for web designers aiming to launch marketing websites quickly. Its pricing starts at $26 per month for the Starter plan or $58 per month for Pro, with a free tier that comes with limitations.
The tool generates a complete website flow from a single text prompt, pulling from a library of over 1,000 reusable components like navigation bars and CTAs. This makes it excellent for landing pages, but it falls short when you need multi-page application flows, as its focus remains on single-page websites.
Where Relume excels is editing. Its manual editor is packed with pre-built blocks and offers intuitive drag-and-drop functionality. You can export directly to Figma or Webflow, which is invaluable for teams already working within those ecosystems. However, if your project requires detailed user journeys across multiple pages, Relume’s one-page constraint can feel restrictive.
✏️ Tip: Use Relume for quick marketing site mockups, but pair it with another tool for apps with multiple screens.
⭐ Score: 3/5 for its solid editing but narrow scope.
🍌 Banani: AI-Driven Simplicity
Banani, priced at $20 per month with a free plan offering around 20 generations, is an approachable tool for beginners.
It generates wireframes page by page from AI prompts, keeping workflows simple but slower for projects that require end-to-end app flows. For instance, you can request “a login page with a remember me checkbox,” and Banani will create three design variations.
Refinement happens through an AI chat interface rather than manual editing, which makes it accessible but restrictive if you want more control. The ability to export designs into Figma helps fill that gap, making it useful as a brainstorming tool for non-designers.
✏️ Tip: Start with Banani to brainstorm individual screens, then export to Figma for detailed refinements.
⭐ Score: 4/5 for user-friendliness, but minus a point for limited editing.
🖥️ Mockflow: Reliable and Detail-Oriented
Mockflow, available for $14 per month when billed annually, is a dependable tool for detailed wireframing.
Like Banani, it generates screens one by one, but it pairs this with a comprehensive manual editor that supports drag-and-drop adjustments. Features such as UX Storyboarding power-ups help map user journeys, and Figma export ensures seamless integration with design workflows.
Its extensive and regularly updated library of UI components provides precision and variety. While building large flows screen by screen takes time, the depth and quality of the output make it worth the investment for SaaS dashboards and detailed web applications.
✏️ Tip: Use its UX Storyboarding power-up to visualize user flows before generating screens.
⭐ Score: 4/5 for its editing capabilities, but, like Banani, minus a point for not supporting full-flow generation.
🖌️ Visily: The All-Rounder
Visily, at $11 per month billed annually, stands out for its versatility. Unlike most alternatives, it supports both screen-by-screen and full-flow generation. With a single prompt such as “a food delivery app with home, filter, and checkout screens,” Visily can generate an entire prototype complete with navigation.
In a 2025 review, Visily successfully generated five connected screens in under a minute with strong UX layouts. Its editor allows intuitive drag-and-drop modifications, and Figma export ensures smooth collaboration with design teams.
✏️ Tip: Use Visily’s Sketch-to-Design feature to digitize hand-drawn ideas during team workshops.
⭐ Score: 5/5 for its balance of power and ease.
🚀 UX Pilot: Budget-Friendly but Limited
At $6 per month, UX Pilot is the most budget-conscious option, with a free tier that provides enough credits to experiment with wireframes and high-fidelity designs. It works via text prompts and allows refinements through an AI-driven chat interface. However, manual editing is limited to text adjustments, with no option for drag-and-drop editing.
The ability to export to Figma helps offset these restrictions, but UX Pilot is best suited for early-stage idea testing rather than complex projects. Its affordability makes it appealing to startups, though teams working on advanced systems may find its limitations frustrating.
✏️ Tip: Use UX Pilot’s “Enhance Prompt” feature to refine vague ideas before generating screens.
⭐ Score: 4/5, docked a point for its editing constraints.
🖼️ Framer: High Cost, Mixed Results
Framer is the most expensive tool in this comparison, costing €75 per month. It primarily targets single-page designs like landing pages and offers simultaneous generation for desktop, tablet, and mobile versions. Its editor is robust and versatile, but reviews in 2024 noted that the AI often misinterprets prompts, producing landing pages instead of dashboards.
Although Figma export is supported, the high subscription fee and inconsistent AI accuracy reduce its value. Framer works best for teams needing polished landing pages quickly, but it is less suitable for app wireframing or complex flows.
✏️ Tip: Test Framer’s free tier before committing, as its AI may not align with your vision.
⭐ Score: 3-/5 for its editing power but shaky AI performance.
🧙♂️ UIzard: Powerful but Missing Figma
UIzard, priced at $12 per month billed annually, rivals Visily in terms of flexibility. It supports both full-flow and screen-by-screen generation, enabling rapid prototyping of entire applications from minimal prompts.
Its AI-driven editing combined with a manual editor gives users strong control over layouts, fonts, and colors, making it an attractive option for teams prioritizing branding.
The lack of Figma integration is its biggest drawback, potentially creating friction for teams heavily reliant on Figma workflows. Despite this, UIzard is a strong tool for startups and growing companies needing robust wireframing without a steep price tag.
✏️ Tip: Use its style customization to align wireframes with your brand early on.
⭐ Score: 5-/5, losing half a point for the Figma gap.
Comparison Matrix
Tips for Getting Started
To get the most from these tools, begin with a clear prompt that describes your app or website’s purpose, such as “a SaaS dashboard with analytics and settings screens.” Visily and UIzard can handle vague prompts well, but for other tools, adding details like “mobile-first” or “minimalist layout” improves results.
Always test free tiers first to avoid paying for tools that don’t fit your workflow. UX Pilot and Banani are particularly generous with free credits. If you sketch on whiteboards during brainstorming sessions, use Visily’s Sketch-to-Design to instantly convert your drawings into wireframes. For Figma users, prioritize tools like Visily or Mockflow for smooth exports.
Finally, take advantage of the ability to generate multiple variations early in the process. Experimentation helps uncover better layouts before investing in polished designs.
Keep in mind that while AI wireframing tools accelerate prototyping, they don’t fully replace the expertise of an analyst or designer when building complex systems that require user testing and long-term planning.
FAQ
Which tool is best for non-designers?
Visily and Banani are the most beginner-friendly. Visily’s intuitive drag-and-drop interface and ability to generate entire flows make it accessible, while Banani’s AI chat system simplifies refinements without requiring design knowledge.
Can these tools handle both mobile and web designs?
Yes. All seven tools support both mobile and web interfaces. Visily and UIzard generate responsive designs for both platforms, Framer produces simultaneous versions for desktop, tablet, and mobile, and tools like Mockflow and UX Pilot support multi-device designs with separate prompts.
How do I choose the right tool for my startup?
It depends on budget, complexity, and workflow. For small budgets, UX Pilot at $6 per month or Visily at $11 per month deliver strong results. For complex apps, Visily and UIzard are the better picks. Teams deeply invested in Figma should avoid UIzard due to its lack of integration. Always experiment with free tiers before making a choice.
Do these tools support collaboration?
Yes, most of them. Visily and Mockflow include real-time editing and comments, Relume offers team support on higher-tier plans, and UX Pilot and Framer allow basic feedback. Banani and UIzard are more individual-focused but still enable sharing results.
Wrapping Up
For teams balancing affordability, functionality, and ease of use, Visily emerges as the strongest option. It combines full-flow generation, manual editing, and Figma integration for just $11 per month, making it a standout for startups and growing companies.
UIzard comes in a close second, offering strong AI-driven generation and editing flexibility, though its lack of Figma integration is a drawback. UX Pilot provides the cheapest entry point at $6 per month but lacks advanced editing capabilities, while Relume and Framer work best in niche use cases like marketing sites or landing pages.
Ultimately, the right choice depends on your project’s complexity, budget, and integration needs. For most teams, Visily and UIzard provide the best combination of power, accessibility, and user satisfaction, making them reliable solutions for modern AI-driven wireframing.
Looking for high-quality wireframes and a step-by-step roadmap? Let’s talk! Reach out or book a consultation today to get started.
.avif)
Comments