In today's digital world, businesses face an important choice when adding video chat to their apps: should they build their own system or buy an existing solution? While platforms like Zoom offer quick setup and proven reliability, creating your own video chat app gives you complete control over how it works and looks. Many companies find themselves weighing these options, trying to balance their need for unique features against time and money constraints. The good news is that you don't have to pick just one path. Some businesses combine both approaches, utilizing ready-made parts while incorporating their own custom features. Your choice will depend on what your team needs, how much you can spend, and what technical skills you have available. Let's explore how to make this decision easier for your video chat app development project.
Why Trust Our Video Chat Development Insights?
At Fora Soft, we've been at the forefront of multimedia development for over 19 years, specializing in video streaming solutions and AI-powered multimedia platforms. Our team has successfully implemented numerous video chat solutions across various industries, from telemedicine platforms to e-learning systems, maintaining a 100% project success rating on Upwork. This extensive experience has given us unique insights into both custom-built and ready-made video chat solutions.
We've worked extensively with core video chat technologies, implementing them across web, mobile, and desktop platforms. Our expertise isn't just theoretical - we've handled everything from initial planning and wireframing to deployment and maintenance of video chat solutions. This hands-on experience has taught us valuable lessons about the practical challenges and opportunities in video chat platform development, which we're sharing in this article.
What's Technically Possible Right Now in Video Chat App Development
You can now easily host video calls with up to 100 people. Big companies like Zoom utilize this technology for meetings and webinars.
Yet, even these tools sometimes have glitches and limits.
Current Video Chat Technology Capabilities and Market Standards
As video chat technology advances, it's crucial to understand what's possible today. You can now host meetings with over 1,000 participants, thanks to WebRTC. This technology runs in browsers, enabling users to join meetings with just a link, providing seamless real-time communication without requiring additional software installations (Mohata et al., 2021).
WebRTC utilizes encrypted connections to maintain data privacy. However, big meetings do not necessarily mean low quality. Current standards support HD video and clear audio.
Users can also share their screens in real-time. Even better, AI-powered features such as noise cancellation and background blur are now commonplace.
However, don't expect all platforms to offer the same features. Some focus on security, while others prioritize user experience. For instance, Zoom gained popularity for its ease of use. Meanwhile, platforms like Signal focus on privacy. Understand that every video chat tool has its strengths and weaknesses.
During the development of ProVideoMeeting, we discovered that WebRTC and HTML5 technologies could automatically adjust video quality based on connection strength, ensuring optimal performance even in varying network conditions.
Real-World Implementation: ProVideoMeeting Case Study
Our experience developing ProVideoMeeting showcases the practical application of modern video chat capabilities. We created a business-focused solution that combines essential conferencing features with unique additions, such as digital legal signatures and identity verification. The platform demonstrates how WebRTC and HTML5 can deliver adaptive video quality while maintaining security and performance. What sets it apart is its signature system, which is compliant with U.S. laws and offers flexible participation options, including dial-in capabilities for users with unstable internet connections.
Common Failures and Limitations in Both Approaches
When developing a video chat app, both building from scratch and buying a pre-built platform present unique challenges.
Common failures in building include underestimating the intricacy of real-time communication. You may face limitations in scaling the app as the user base grows. Custom development also requires constant updates to keep up with browser and device changes.
Buying a pre-built platform isn't fail-proof either. You may encounter limitations in customizing the platform to fit your specific needs. Vendor lock-in is a significant risk; you are dependent on the provider for updates and fixes.
Additionally, pre-built solutions mightn't integrate well with your existing tools. For instance, a company discovered that its video chat platform was unable to sync correctly with its customer service software, resulting in delays in response times.
Both approaches have trade-offs. Building takes more time and resources but offers flexibility. Buying saves time but has dependency drawbacks.
Weigh these limitations against your goals and resources.
In our experience with ProVideoMeeting, we overcame typical integration challenges by ensuring seamless calendar sync with both Google and Outlook, addressing a common pain point in video conferencing solutions.
Best-Fitting Video Chat Development Solutions
Building a custom video chat app makes sense when you need unique features.
Top ready-made platforms and SDKs include Agora, Twilio, and Daily.Co.
Hybrid approaches let you start with a pre-built solution and add custom features later.
When Building Custom Video Chat Apps Makes Sense
Although video chat platforms like Zoom and Google Meet offer sturdy features, there are times when they don’t fit your specific needs. Building a custom video chat app can make sense when you need unique features.
For instance, a healthcare provider might need a video chat app that integrates with patient records. A school may want a platform that integrates with its learning management system. When you create a chat app, you control the design and functionality. You decide on the user experience. You set the security measures. You can tailor the app to match your brand.
Building a custom video chat app also lets you scale as needed. You won’t face the limits of pre-built platforms. Plus, you can update features quickly based on user feedback. This level of control is essential for businesses looking to stand out.
While developing ProVideoMeeting, we identified a crucial market need for legal digital signatures within video conferencing. This led us to implement a signature system compliant with U.S. laws, complete with SMS and snapshot verification.
Top Ready-Made Video Chat Platforms and SDKs
You don't always have to build from scratch. Many companies offer ready-made video chat platforms and SDKs. These tools help you quickly add video chat to your product. Twilio is one popular choice. It provides APIs that allow you to embed video chat into your apps. Twilio's tools are dependable and widely used.
Jitsi is another strong option. It's open-source and offers a variety of features. Jitsi allows you to host video conferences with multiple participants. It also supports screen sharing and chat functions.
Both Twilio and Jitsi use WebRTC technology. This guarantees high-quality video and audio. These platforms handle the complex parts of video chat development. This includes managing servers and ensuring secure connections.
You focus on integrating these tools into your product. Your developers can use the provided SDKs and APIs. This saves time and effort. You can launch your video chat feature faster.
Hybrid Approaches: Starting with Buy, Scaling with Build
While ready-made platforms offer quick solutions, they may not always fit your long-term needs. You might start with a bought video chat app to launch swiftly.
As your user base grows, you find that the platform lacks particular features. For instance, Zoom initially licensed its service but later developed in-house features for better control. You can do the same.
Commence with a bought solution for quick market entry. Then, gradually build and integrate custom features during the app development process. This approach enables you to test ideas quickly and refine them as needed.
Companies like Slack started with off-the-shelf solutions and later built their own video chat features. This hybrid method combines the speed of buying with the flexibility of building.
Our development of ProVideoMeeting demonstrated how a hybrid approach could work effectively. We began with essential video conferencing capabilities and gradually added advanced features, including vanity rooms and customizable interfaces.
Cost Analysis and Implementation Roadmap
You'll first need to understand the costs of building vs buying a video chat platform. Different intricacy levels have different timelines.
Let's start with what it takes to go from an MVP to a full-scale platform.
Video Chat App Development Costs: Build vs Buy Breakdown
When deciding whether to build or buy a video chat platform, cost is a critical factor.
Building your own app development software means you have complete control over every feature. However, video chat app development costs can skyrocket. You need to hire developers with specific skills. You also need to buy equipment and tools for them. This process can take months, even years. Additionally, you must regularly maintain and update the software.
Buying a ready-made platform is quicker. You skip the lengthy development phase. You pay a set fee for the service. This fee often includes maintenance and updates.
However, customization is limited. You depend on the provider for new features. Additionally, costs can accumulate with subscription fees.
Consider your budget and timeline carefully. Weigh the pros and cons of each approach.
Timeline Estimates for Different Complexity Levels
Building a video chat platform from scratch can take considerable time, depending on the intricacy you need. Research by Hafiar et al. confirms that a basic video chat app development typically requires 3-6 months, which includes planning, designing, and coding core features like user registration, chat rooms, and video calls (Hafiar et al., 2022).
However, adding advanced features can extend the timeline. For instance, incorporating screen sharing, recording, and real-time translation may push the project to 6-12 months. Complex enterprise-level solutions require thorough security, scalability, and integration with other systems, typically taking 12-24 months to develop due to the significant investment needed in resources and security infrastructure (Damasiotis et al., 2018).
Conversely, buying a ready-made video chat app markedly reduces the timeline. You can launch within days or weeks, depending on customization needs.
Getting Started: From MVP to Full-Scale Platform
Starting with a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) is essential. An MVP lets you test key features quickly. For a video chat platform, your MVP might include basic video calls and chat. Don't worry about advanced features like screen sharing or virtual backgrounds yet. Focus on mobile app development first. Many users prefer mobile devices for video chats.
Building an MVP for mobile helps you reach a larger audience faster. Remember, WhatsApp started as a simple messaging app. They added voice and video calls later. Follow a similar path. Create your MVP, gather user feedback, then plan your next steps.
This approach saves time and resources. You avoid building features users don't want. Gradually, add more features based on user needs. Move from MVP to a full-scale platform step by step. Keep your users engaged throughout the process.
Video Chat Platform Decision Matrix
Making the right choice between building or buying a video chat platform requires careful consideration of multiple factors. This interactive decision matrix helps you visualize how different business scenarios align with each approach, allowing you to explore real-world trade-offs between cost, time, control, and scalability that we've discussed in our video chat development experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
What Are the Security Implications of Each Approach?
Building means you're responsible for securing every component, but you control all security measures. Buying puts security in the vendor's hands, so you're trusting their protocols and updates to be effective.
How Does Each Option Scale With User Growth?
Building scales better with user growth as you control the infrastructure, but it requires more resources to maintain. Buying may initially handle growth, but you're dependent on the vendor's capabilities and may face limitations or price hikes as you scale.
What Customer Support Is Available for Each Approach?
With a build approach, you're responsible for customer support, requiring your own ticketing system and team. If you buy, the vendor typically offers customer support, with SLAs and dedicated teams for faster issue resolution.
How Will Each Approach Impact Our Time to Market?
Building a video chat platform from scratch will significantly delay your time to market due to the development and testing phases. Buying an existing solution expedites this process, enabling you to reach the market much quicker.
What Are the Key Legal and Compliance Considerations?
You'll need to take into account data privacy laws and healthcare regulations, if applicable, and ensure compliance with standards like HIPAA and GDPR. Building gives you control, but buying might offer guaranteed compliance.
Conclusion
Building a video chat platform from scratch gives you control. You pick the features and tools. But buying a ready-made solution saves time. It's quicker to launch. Weigh your needs carefully. Custom builds can fail if not well-planned. Pre-built options might lack some features. Consider both paths. Your choice shapes the future of your product.
References
Damasiotis, V., Fitsilis, P., & O'Kane, J. (2018). Modeling software development process complexity. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, 9(4), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijitpm.2018100102
Hafiar, H., Sjoraida, D., & Amin, K. (2022). Understanding intention to use communication technology among legislators: A UTAUT model perspective. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi (Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies), 6(2), 573-586. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v6i2.4900
Mohata, R., Goel, A., Bahl, V., & Sengar, N. (2021). Peer to peer real-time communication using WebRTC. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology, 178-183. https://doi.org/10.32628/cseit217647
.avif)
Comments