Janus (launched 2014) was one of the earliest open-source WebRTC servers and remains widely deployed. Unlike mediasoup or LiveKit, which present themselves primarily as SFUs, Janus is a general-purpose WebRTC gateway with a plugin architecture: the SFU is one plugin (videoroom), but other plugins handle one-way streaming (streaming), recording (recordplay), SIP gateway (sip), TextRoom and others. This makes Janus the Swiss-army-knife choice for projects that need WebRTC integration with multiple non-WebRTC systems.
Janus is written in C for performance, with HTTP, WebSocket and Unix-socket APIs for control. It runs single-process with worker threads — more traditional than mediasoup's per-CPU-process model. The community is large and active; commercial support is available from Meetecho and several partners. Large-scale deployments include Slack Huddles, Linphone, and many telecom-adjacent video conferencing systems.
Janus's strengths are flexibility (plugins for everything) and broadcast/streaming integration. Its weaknesses are a steeper learning curve than LiveKit and a less JavaScript-friendly API than mediasoup. For pure WebRTC SFU use, mediasoup or LiveKit are often easier. For complex hybrid deployments — WebRTC plus SIP plus broadcast streaming plus recording — Janus's plugin ecosystem is hard to beat.
The book · Volume 3 of 7
Video Streaming: A Complete Guide to Video Delivery: From ABR and CDNs to Players, WebRTC, DRM, and the Economics of Streaming
Janus is a flexible WebRTC gateway, and its plugin model suits products that need more than a plain SFU. Volume 3 covers Janus in the context of WebRTC and real-time media: video calls and conferencing, SFU and MCU topologies, and QoE monitoring. Written by Nikolay Sapunov, CEO at Fora Soft.
Choosing Janus or another WebRTC server for your product?
We will compare Janus with other WebRTC servers for your use case and give you an architecture and hosting estimate. 250+ video products shipped since 2005.
