AI Video Streaming DevelopmentCustom-built since 2005

Video streaming that scales with your AI.
Without the SaaS tax.

You own the streaming stack — encoder, SFU, delivery, AI pipeline — from day one. Built on mediasoup 3.16, LiveKit, HLS / LL-HLS / CMAF, and MoQ Transport. Proven at Sprii (€365M+ in e-commerce live streaming), Nucleus (600M+ live minutes/month), and BrainCert (500M+ minutes/month, virtual classrooms). Per-minute economics that beat Daily, Twilio Live, Mux, and Agora at scale.

€365M+
Revenue powered through Sprii live commerce streaming
600M+
Live minutes/month on Nucleus WebRTC stack
500M+
Live minutes/month on BrainCert virtual classroom
20+
Years building production streaming infrastructure
Built for
Virtual classrooms & e-learningLive commerce & social shoppingTelemedicine & teleconsultBroadcast & live eventsGaming & esports streamingEnterprise collaboration
SaaS streaming vs custom scalable streaming

Same protocols. Different unit economics.

SaaS streaming platforms — Daily, Twilio Live, Mux, Agora, Vonage — ship in days on a per-minute pricing model. Custom development takes longer to start and pays back the moment minutes pile up, AI features get bolted on, or data residency starts mattering. Below: where they differ on what buyers actually care about, then the protocol-by-protocol matrix underneath for the engineers in the room.

Capability SaaS streaming platforms Custom scalable streaming
Protocol coverage Vendor's preset stack — typically WebRTC or HLS, rarely both well WebRTC (mediasoup 3.16, LiveKit) + HLS / LL-HLS / CMAF + MoQ — picked per use case
End-to-end latency 200ms–2s depending on vendor and tier Sub-200ms WebRTC, sub-500ms LL-HLS, sub-2s HLS — you tune the budget
Cost at scale (1M+ min/mo) $0.001–0.01 per participant-minute, linear forever Flat infra cost + bandwidth — amortizes to fractions of a cent at the BrainCert / Nucleus scale
AI integration Vendor's AI add-ons at vendor's price and roadmap Your stack: Whisper, ElevenLabs, your moderation models, your taxonomy — wired in directly
Data residency & recording Wherever the vendor's cloud sits On-prem, VPC, or specific region. Recording stays yours. GDPR / HIPAA / SOC 2 enforceable
Extensibility Locked to vendor SDK and roadmap Custom features, codecs, layouts on your timeline

Each protocol earns its place at a different point on the latency / scale / cost curve.

Protocol End-to-end latency Scale ceiling Best fit
WebRTC Sub-200ms Tens of thousands per SFU shard, millions across regions Real-time interaction — classrooms, telehealth, live commerce host stream
LL-HLS / CMAF 1–3 seconds Effectively unlimited via CDN Large-audience live with chat — events, sports, town halls
Standard HLS / DASH 6–10 seconds Effectively unlimited via CDN VOD-style live, mobile-first, regulated markets
MoQ Transport (QUIC) Sub-300ms target CDN-scale Emerging — IETF draft. Best-of-both-worlds candidate for 2026–27 builds
RTMP / SRT (ingest only) 2–4 seconds Per-encoder, no fan-out Camera → origin only — not viewer-facing

Numbers reflect Fora Soft production deployments on Sprii (€365M+ revenue in live commerce), Nucleus (600M+ live min/mo), BrainCert (500M+ min/mo virtual classrooms), and Worldcast Live (10K+ concurrent viewers per event). Your numbers will move with your concurrency curve, geographic spread, and codec choices.

How it works

Five layers from camera to viewer. Each one budgeted for latency and scale.

A streaming platform isn't one service — it's an inference and delivery graph with a latency budget at every hop. Miss the budget anywhere and you ship dropped frames, lagging chat, AI captions that arrive after the moment they describe, or a CDN bill that doesn't survive your next growth quarter.

01

Capture & ingest

Hosts, cameras, and contributors push in over RTMP, SRT, WHIP, or WebRTC — picked by network reliability and how much resilience the source needs. Ingest sits at the edge of your VPC so authentication, recording consent, and DRM keys never leave your perimeter.

Source frame received • 0ms baseline
02

Routing — SFU / MCU

mediasoup 3.16 or LiveKit 1.x handles SFU routing for sub-200ms interactive streams. Janus or custom MCU for transcoded composite layouts. Sharding by room ID + geography keeps any single SFU node under 1500 participants — the scale ceiling Nucleus and BrainCert have benchmarked.

Stream forwarded to subscribers • budget < 40ms
03

AI overlay — transcription, translation, moderation

Whisper Large-v3, Deepgram Nova-3, or NVIDIA Parakeet for ASR; SeamlessM4T or DeepL Voice for live translation; custom moderation models for content classification. AI runs as a parallel pipeline so the primary stream isn't blocked by inference cost.

Captions / translations / moderation verdicts • budget < 800ms
04

Delivery — HLS / LL-HLS / CMAF / MoQ

Multi-bitrate transcoding (FFmpeg, AWS MediaLive, Wowza, or custom pipelines) produces adaptive renditions. CDN distribution (Cloudflare, Fastly, AWS CloudFront) fans out to thousands of viewers. WebRTC fanout for sub-200ms interactive viewers; LL-HLS for large-audience live; MoQ Transport for the 2026–27 hybrid path.

First frame at viewer • budget < 200ms (WebRTC) / < 3s (HLS)
05

Storage, recall & telemetry

Recordings to S3-compatible object storage with HLS segment indexing for instant scrubbing. Event metadata to ClickHouse or PostgreSQL for forensic search and viewer analytics. Quality-of-experience telemetry (rebuffering, dropped frames, join time) feeds an SRE dashboard so regressions get caught in minutes, not days.

Operator console refresh • budget < 50ms

End-to-end budget depends on use case: sub-200ms for interactive WebRTC, sub-3s for large-audience LL-HLS, sub-second for AI-augmented broadcast. We benchmark every build against your scene density, concurrency curve, and geographic spread before sign-off.

System architecture

Eight layers. Production-grade tools at each one.

Every layer is a deliberate choice for scale, not a default. The list below is what we deploy on real production streams — not a survey of options. When something here doesn't fit your environment (Vonage instead of LiveKit, GCP instead of AWS, a regulated codec list), we name the substitute in the architecture document, not the marketing page.

LAYER
TOOLS WE DEPLOY
Capture & ingest
RTMP, SRT, WHIP / WHEP, WebRTC — picked per source reliability. NGINX-RTMP, AWS Elemental MediaConnect, or custom Go ingest
Signaling & auth
WebSocket signaling (custom or LiveKit-native), JWT-based room tokens, room metadata in Redis, RBAC tied to your auth provider (Auth0, Cognito, Keycloak)
SFU / MCU
mediasoup 3.16, LiveKit 1.x, Janus, Pion, or Twilio / Agora / Vonage when SaaS economics make sense — architecture stays portable
Transcoding & packaging
FFmpeg pipelines, AWS MediaLive, Wowza Streaming Engine, Bitmovin. CMAF / HLS / DASH packaging. AV1 + H.265 where playback supports it
AI overlays
Whisper Large-v3, Deepgram Nova-3, faster-whisper (ASR); SeamlessM4T, DeepL Voice (translation); ElevenLabs Turbo (TTS); custom moderation classifiers
Delivery / CDN
Cloudflare Stream, AWS CloudFront, Fastly, BunnyCDN. WebRTC fanout via mediasoup pipes. MoQ Transport via quic-go or Cloudflare quiche for 2026–27 roadmaps
Storage & recall
S3-compatible object store for video, PostgreSQL or ClickHouse for events, pgvector / Milvus / Qdrant for AI-extracted entity search across recordings
Operator & analytics
React + WebRTC operator dashboards, mobile (React Native or native), SRE QoE telemetry (rebuffer ratio, join time, dropped frames), Datadog / Grafana integration

Compliance overlays — GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, SOC 2, FERPA — are enforced inside each layer: encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access for recordings, audit logs on stream join / leave, data residency pinned per region, retention windows configurable per room class.

Use cases

Same stack. Six shapes the buyer pays for.

Streaming infrastructure isn't generic. A live commerce host stream is not the same product as a regulated telehealth call, even if both run on WebRTC. The taxonomy, the AI overlays, the recording policy, the QoE telemetry — those are where custom development earns its keep. Six shapes Fora Soft has shipped to production.

Live commerce & social shopping

Sprii — the flagship deployment — has powered €365M+ in revenue through host-led live shopping streams. Sub-200ms host-to-viewer latency, in-stream cart + checkout, multi-host shows, replay-with-purchase. WebRTC for hosts, LL-HLS for the audience overflow.

Virtual classrooms & e-learning

BrainCert runs 500M+ live minutes/month for virtual classrooms with proctoring, breakout rooms, whiteboards, and SCORM 2004 / LTI 1.3 integrations. Multi-room scheduling, instructor-led recording controls, on-demand replays with chapter markers.

Broadcast & live events

Worldcast Live handles 10K+ concurrent viewers per event with LL-HLS delivery and a CDN fanout designed for spike days. Operator dashboards for live moderation, multi-camera director switching, instant clip generation for social cutdown.

Telemedicine & teleconsult

HIPAA-grade WebRTC sessions with role-based access, session recording with patient consent flows, integration with Epic / Cerner / MEDITECH where the consult belongs to a chart. Encrypted recording at rest. NHS UK — in production.

Real-time interpretation & multilingual events

Translinguist — $4.2M ARR — runs simultaneous interpretation streams alongside the main session, with sub-second translation latency via SeamlessM4T or human interpreter mixing (KUDO, Interprefy patterns). Multi-language audio tracks delivered over WebRTC.

Custom — your concurrency curve

Most engagements start with a profile nobody else has built before. The work is mapping the concurrency curve, the geographic spread, the codec / device matrix, and the AI features the product depends on — then designing the stack to hit it. Discovery call is the first hour.

Build vs Buy

Different unit economics. Different ceiling on what AI can do.

SaaS streaming platforms — Daily, Twilio Live, Mux, Agora, Vonage — are excellent up to a point. They ship in days, the SDKs are mature, and the SLAs are signed. The point where custom development pays back is specific: when minutes pile up, when AI features need direct stack access, or when data residency stops matching the vendor's cloud. The decision isn't "which is better" — it's "where does your three-year cost curve land."

Buy

SaaS streaming — Daily, Twilio Live, Mux, Agora

Vendor-owned cloud, vendor-owned SDK, per-minute pricing that scales linearly with usage. Excellent for getting to production fast.

Live in days with stock SDKs
$0.001–0.01 per participant-minute — linear forever
AI features limited to vendor's catalog and pricing
Data residency = wherever the vendor's cloud sits
Use when: monthly minutes stay under ~500K, AI integrations fit vendor presets, and per-minute SaaS economics work for your business model.
Build

Custom scalable streaming — you own the stack

mediasoup / LiveKit / FFmpeg / your codec choices / your AI pipeline. Higher upfront effort; flat infra cost after launch.

10–16 weeks to production on a defined scope
Flat infra cost + bandwidth — amortizes to fractions of a cent at Nucleus / BrainCert scale
AI integration on your timeline — Whisper, ElevenLabs, your moderation
On-prem or VPC — GDPR / HIPAA / SOC 2 enforceable
Use when: monthly minutes cross ~1M, AI features need direct stack access, or regulated data residency is on the requirement list.
Figure 1. Streaming Build vs Buy decision matrix — cost per minute vs scaleA two-axis chart plotting cost per participant minute on the Y axis against monthly minutes on the X axis. SaaS streaming platforms scale linearly with cost across all volumes. Hybrid (SaaS plus custom AI bolt-on) sits at mid-cost. Custom Fora Soft builds amortize sharply once monthly minutes cross ~1M, with the break-even point marked on the chart.$ PER PARTICIPANT-MINMONTHLY MINUTES →$0.010$0.005$0.002$0.0005$0.0001100K500K1M (break-even)100M+break-evenSaaS streamingDaily, Twilio Live, Mux, Agoralinear $/min, no amortizationCustom build (Fora Soft)You own the stackfractions of a cent at Nucleus / BrainCert scaleBreak-even sits around 1M monthly participant-minutes. Below: SaaS is faster + cheaper. Above: custom wins on every axis.
Figure 1. Decision matrix — cost per participant-minute against monthly volume. SaaS holds the linear cost line; custom builds invert the curve once the platform crosses ~1M minutes/month. Sprii, Nucleus, BrainCert all live on the right side of the break-even.

Hybrid is a real option — keep an existing SaaS for low-volume use cases, layer custom WebRTC + AI for the high-volume / high-AI-feature flows. We architect that bridge in roughly 25% of engagements.

How we engage

Three ways in. One outcome — streams that scale.

Engagement model is matched to where you are, not where we'd prefer you to be. The three shapes below cover roughly 90% of how Fora Soft enters a streaming project.

From scratch

Build the platform end-to-end

Discovery → architecture → MVP → production. We own the stack and ship in 10–16 weeks on a defined scope. Best fit when there's no existing system or when the SaaS economics are about to flip. Sprii and BrainCert were both built this way.

Discuss scope
Upgrades & improvements

Extend what's already running

SaaS-to-custom migration on a flow you've outgrown, AI overlay added to a running stack (transcription, translation, moderation), LL-HLS delivery layer added to an interactive WebRTC base, CDN re-architecture for spike days. We integrate without ripping out what works.

Discuss scope
Takeovers & fixes

Take the codebase off a stuck team

Inherited a streaming stack nobody fully understands? A previous vendor walked away mid-build? Streams dropping under load with no clear root cause? We've done the takeover dance enough times to make it boring: audit, stabilize, document, ship the next version. NDA before access; honest verdict on what's salvageable.

Discuss scope
Pricing

Three tiers. Named tech in each. No “contact sales” for the bracket.

The number you see is the bracket the build typically lands in. Final scope depends on concurrency target, geographic spread, AI features, codec / device matrix, and compliance overlays — we name the moving parts in the discovery call before you commit.

Startup
from $8K
2–3 weeks • single use case • up to ~500 concurrent
  • mediasoup 3.16 SFU on a single region
  • One room class (e.g. virtual classroom or live commerce host stream)
  • WebRTC for hosts + LL-HLS overflow for viewers
  • Recording to S3 with HLS segment indexing
  • Operator web dashboard + mobile alerts
Get an instant estimate
Most common
Growth
from $20K
3–6 weeks • multi-use-case • up to ~10K concurrent
  • Multi-region SFU sharding (mediasoup / LiveKit)
  • 2–3 room classes (e.g. interactive + broadcast + replay)
  • Real-time transcription / translation overlay (Whisper, SeamlessM4T)
  • CMAF packaging + multi-bitrate transcoding
  • ClickHouse / pgvector for forensic search across recordings
  • Role-based operator console, audit logs, moderation tooling
Book a free 30-min call
Enterprise
from $40K
6–12 weeks+ • multi-region • 100K+ concurrent / 100M+ min/mo
  • Multi-region SFU clusters with geographic auto-routing
  • Full AI pipeline: ASR + translation + TTS + moderation
  • Hybrid WebRTC + LL-HLS + MoQ Transport delivery
  • Compliance overlays: GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, SOC 2, FERPA
  • Custom AI models per use case (moderation taxonomy, voice profiles)
  • Dedicated SRE handover, runbooks, on-call rotation
  • Reference scale: Nucleus (600M+ min/mo), BrainCert (500M+), Sprii (€365M+ revenue)
Book a free 30-min call

Add-ons priced separately: per-region infrastructure, custom AI model training cycles, third-party SDK licenses (Bitmovin, Wowza), regulatory certification audits, premium CDN contracts. We itemize before contract.

Free for qualified projects

Three deliverables. Yours within a week.

An independent assessment of your streaming build, written by engineers who would actually ship it. Pick the one that fits where you are now: planning the MVP, mid-build, or stabilizing what's already in production. NDA before any code, footage, or system access changes hands.

No commitment. NDA before any code, footage, or system access is shared.

Why hire Fora Soft

Twenty years of building streaming systems that actually run at scale.

Not a generalist studio with a streaming practice. Not a SaaS reseller in a custom-dev jacket. Fora Soft has been building real-time video and WebRTC infrastructure since 2005 — and the live commerce, virtual classroom, broadcast, telehealth, and interpretation work below is the same team, the same stack, the same engineering bar.

20+ years

Production track record since 2005

625+ products shipped. Streaming is what we built the company on — long before WebRTC was a standard or LL-HLS had a draft. We've watched the streaming stack transition from RTMP to HLS, from HLS to LL-HLS, from MCU to SFU, and now from HLS to MoQ Transport. Every generation has shipped through us.

€365M+ revenue

Sprii — live commerce at production scale

Powered €365M+ in revenue through host-led live shopping streams. Sub-200ms WebRTC for hosts, LL-HLS for the audience overflow, in-stream cart + checkout, multi-host shows, replay-with-purchase. The streaming stack that proves AI live commerce works at scale.

1.1B+ min/mo

Nucleus + BrainCert — raw streaming scale

Nucleus runs 600M+ live minutes/month on a pure WebRTC stack — our scale benchmark for SFU-driven applications. BrainCert runs another 500M+ for virtual classrooms with proctoring, breakouts, and SCORM / LTI integration. Both deployments live on architecture Fora Soft designed and ships.

100% in-house

One team. Streaming, AI, mobile, infra, ops.

No outsourcing chain. The WebRTC engineer who tunes your SFU sits next to the iOS engineer who builds the operator app and the SRE who runs your CMAF packaging. 100% Upwork Top-Rated Plus, 100% job success on enterprise engagements. NDA before any code access; honest verdict before any contract.

Common questions

What streaming buyers ask before the discovery call.

At what scale does custom streaming beat SaaS like Daily, Twilio Live, or Agora?

Break-even sits around 1M monthly participant-minutes for most use cases. Below that, SaaS is faster to launch and the per-minute economics work. Above it, custom builds amortize sharply — Nucleus runs 600M+ min/mo at fractions of a cent per minute, where a SaaS bill at $0.005/min would be $3M/month. The decision frame is in the Build vs Buy section above.

What's the end-to-end latency for WebRTC vs LL-HLS vs HLS?

WebRTC: sub-200ms when the SFU is regional to your viewers. LL-HLS / CMAF: 1–3 seconds depending on segment length and CDN configuration. Standard HLS / DASH: 6–10 seconds. We pick per use case — interactive flows on WebRTC, large-audience live on LL-HLS, mobile / regulated on standard HLS. MoQ Transport (IETF draft) targets sub-300ms with CDN-scale fanout, which is the 2026–27 candidate for the hybrid path.

Can you migrate us off Daily / Twilio Live / Agora without downtime?

Yes — we run roughly 25% of engagements as parallel-build migrations. New mediasoup / LiveKit SFU comes up next to the existing SaaS, traffic is split by room class or feature flag, the SaaS stays as fallback while metrics are validated, then traffic shifts over once latency and QoE match or beat the baseline. Typical migration window is 6–10 weeks.

Do you support multi-region SFU sharding for global concurrency?

Yes. mediasoup SFU instances run in each major region (us-east, us-west, eu-west, ap-southeast, ap-east) with a routing layer that pairs participants by latency to the nearest healthy SFU. Cross-region SFU pipes handle multi-region rooms when needed. This is the architecture Nucleus runs to hit 600M+ minutes/month.

How does AI integration work — real-time transcription, translation, moderation?

AI runs as a parallel inference pipeline so the primary stream isn't blocked by ASR latency. Whisper Large-v3, Deepgram Nova-3, or NVIDIA Parakeet for transcription; SeamlessM4T or DeepL Voice for translation; custom moderation classifiers for content policy. Captions / translations are delivered as a separate data track over WebRTC or as a synchronized side-channel for HLS — budget is under 800ms end-to-end for the AI output.

Is the system GDPR / HIPAA / SOC 2 / FERPA compliant?

When architected correctly, yes. Compliance is enforced inside each layer: encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access for recordings, audit logs on every join / leave, data residency pinned to region (us-east only, eu-west only, etc.), retention windows configurable per room class, BAA signed for HIPAA flows, DPIA documentation for GDPR. We sign Data Processing Agreements before any engagement.

Can you handle 100K+ concurrent viewers per event?

Yes — Worldcast Live runs 10K+ concurrent per event today on LL-HLS over CDN; the architecture extends linearly via CDN origin scaling. For interactive WebRTC flows, the ceiling is per SFU shard (1500–2000 participants) with horizontal sharding for multi-room or large-audience hybrid configurations (host on WebRTC, audience on LL-HLS).

How long does an MVP take to ship?

10–12 weeks for a Startup-tier scope (single room class, up to ~500 concurrent, single region). 14–18 weeks for Growth (multi-room, AI overlay, multi-region SFU, up to ~10K concurrent). 18–24 weeks+ for Enterprise (multi-region clusters, full AI pipeline, full compliance overlay, custom moderation models). Discovery call to first running room is typically 3–4 weeks regardless of tier.

Who owns the IP — us or Fora Soft?

You do. Models, training data, infrastructure code, operator UI, and AI pipelines are all delivered to your repositories under your name. Fora Soft retains no claim on the IP. The benefit of custom development over SaaS is exactly this: the streams, the recordings, and the unit economics live on your balance sheet rather than the vendor's.

What's the engagement model after launch?

Three shapes: handover to your in-house team with runbooks and on-call training (most common at Enterprise tier); ongoing SRE / AI-tuning retainer (typical at Growth tier when in-house streaming expertise isn't on the roadmap yet); or fixed-scope quarterly improvement cycles (new room classes, new AI features, codec migrations). All three are scoped after the initial build, not bundled.

Further reading

Go deeper before the call.

Have an idea?

Tell us about your stream.

Within 48 hours you'll get a realistic estimate, a technical recommendation, and an outline of next steps. No obligation. NDA before any access to your code, recordings, or operator dashboards.

+1 (914) 775-5855
New York · USA
Specialist software house for video, real-time and AI products. Founded 2005.
50 in-house engineers.
Describe your project and we will get in touch
Enter your message
Enter your email
Enter your name

By submitting data in this form, you agree with the Personal Data Processing Policy.

Your message has been sent successfully
We will contact you soon
Message not sent. Please try again.